Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Google Reportedly Plans Instant-Messaging System
Google Talk could be launched as early as tomorrow
News Story by Reuters

"Google, Inc. is set to introduce its own instant messaging system, the Los Angeles Times reported today. The move marks the Web search leader's expansion into text and also voice communications.

Citing unnamed sources "familiar with the service," the newspaper said that Google's instant messaging program would be called Google Talk and could be launched as early as tomorrow. Google Talk goes beyond text-based instant messaging, using a computer
keyboard to let users hold voice conversations with other computer users, the newspaper quoted a source as saying."

Read the entire article at:
Google Reportedly Plans Instant-Messaging System

Technorati Tags: , ,


Monday, August 22, 2005

Google Updates Desktop Search
By Jennifer Laycock
Search Engine Guide

Dave's Comments: Google just kicked the "search wars" up another notch with its release of Desktop 2, the latest version of its desktop search tool. The most interesting new feature from my perspective is "Sidebar", a neat feature that is designed to aggregate information from a number of sources based on the searches the user performs and the Web sites s/he visits.

"As Yahoo! and MSN storm forward in the search wars with various news and product releases, Google volleys back with yet another attempt to "organize the world's information." Google unveiled version two of its desktop search software this morning. Google Desktop 2 featured an updated look and a suite of new tools designed to improve a users' overall search experience.

Not just for searching anymore, the latest version of Google Desktop works to personalize information based on a users' past actions. Information is categorized and can be displayed in a window called the "Sidebar" that slides neatly up against the right side of a users' screen. The new sidebar option features quick access to a variety of bits of information, including:..."

Read the entire article at:
Google Updates Desktop Search

Technorati Tags: , ,


Wednesday, August 17, 2005

New Ask Jeeves Sponsored Listings Program Lets More Advertisers Buy Direct
By Danny Sullivan
SearchEngineWatch

Dave's Comments: Nice, detailed overview (as usual) from Danny Sullivan on AskJeeves' new inhouse automated ad serving service. My advice to Web site owners who purchase Google Adwords ads: compare where your Google Adwords ads are serving for your keyword searches on both Google and AskJeeves. If the ads are not serving in equivalent positions on both, take a look at your Web site analytics report to see which engine is sending you the most "organic search" traffic, then base your final decision where to advertise on how important AskJeeves search traffic is to your overall success.

"After weeks of rumors, Ask Jeeves unveiled a new automated paid listings service -- Ask Jeeves Sponsored Listings. It allows anyone to purchase ads on the Ask Jeeves network directly, rather than having to buy placement via Google or to work through an Ask Jeeves account rep.

Google is the primary way most advertisers currently appear at Ask Jeeves. Those buying ads on Google also automatically show up at Ask Jeeves and other Ask-owned properties through a partnership that began in September 2002, unless an advertiser specifically chooses to opt out of the Google Network to run ads only on Google's sites.

The Ask Jeeves-Google partnership isn't ending. Google's ads will continue to show up on Ask Jeeves. But now, advertisers can easily purchase placement directly through Ask Jeeves itself."

Read the entire article at:
www.clickz.com/experts/search/opt/article.php/3525286

Technorati Tags: , ,


Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Mastering Google AdWords Marketing: Contextual Advertising - Parts 1 and 2
By Richard Ball
Search Engine Guide

Dave's Comments: As Richard points out, you're really dealing with two VERY different audiences in terms of motivation in the Google Adwords Search and Content ad networks, and the default setting in Adwords when setting up a campaign is to display the same ad on BOTH networks. Take the time to read this article - both parts. You'll be glad you did!

"Separate your Google AdWords search advertising and contextual advertising. Why?

1. The target audiences could be different
2. Content ads don't perform as well (in most cases)
3. Track separately to see which type works for your situation
4. Add clarity to search stats
5. Google has a "negative site feature" for contextual ad campaigns

How? When creating an AdWords ad campaign, you will be given this choice:

Show ads on Google and the
[] search network
[] content network

Create two separate campaigns, one with only the search network box checked and one with only the content network box checked. The target audience for search ads and content ads (contextual ads) can be quite different. Let's call them searchers (active) and browsers (passive), respectively. Searchers are actively typing the keywords you are bidding on. Browsers, who see your ad triggered by a contextual advertising system, are more passive in the sense that they didn't type specific keywords into a search box."

Read Part 1 of this article at:
http://www.searchengineguide.com/ball/005223.html

Read Part 2 of this article at:
http://www.searchengineguide.com/ball/005288.html

Technorati Tags: , ,


Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Search Engine Results Continuing to Diverge
By Chris Sherman, Associate Editor
SearchEngineWatch

Dave's Comments: A comparison of of first page search results for 4 of the most popular search engines - Google, Yahoo!, MSN and AskJeeves. It's really quite amazing how much the results vary between any 2 search engines, and particularly, among all 4 of the engines. A must read!

"A new study suggests that the overlap between search engine results is less than it was even a few months ago, and that the voices of each engine are growing even more unique.

It's easy to think of search engines as black boxes that all deliver more or less the same results. But that's not an accurate view, according to a study released today by Dogpile and researchers from the University of Pittsburgh and Penn State University.

The study looked at search results from more than 12,500 random queries on Ask Jeeves, Google, MSN search and Yahoo, and found that the overlap in first page results for these four engines was a scant 1.1% on average for a given query, suggesting that each of the four major search engines has a unique voice that's not duplicated by the other services."

Read more about the survey, including links to comprehensive survey results:
http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3524411

Technorati Tags: , ,


Sunday, August 07, 2005

State of the Blogosphere, August 2005, Part 1: Blog Growth
By Dave Sifry
Technorati

Dave's Comments: The number of blogs in the "Blogosphere" is DOUBLING every 5.5 MONTHS! A source of Customers, Prospects and information that Web Marketers can NOT afford to ignore!

"Well, it is that time again! It has been almost 6 months since the last State of the Blogosphere, and so the team at Technorati and I have put together some high level information on what we've been tracking. Today I'll focus on the macro growth of the blogosphere, both in the number of bloggers out there, as well as in the growth of new blogs per day.

As of the end of July 2005, Technorati was tracking over 14.2 Million weblogs, and over 1.3 billion links. Interestingly, this is just about double the number of blogs that we were tracking 5 months ago. In March 2005 we were tracking 7.8 million blogs, which means the blogosphere has just about doubled again in the past 5 months, and that the blogosphere continues to double about every 5.5 months."

Read the entire "Blogosphere" report by clicking on this link:
http://www.technorati.com/weblog/2005/08/34.html

Technorati Tags: , ,


Saturday, August 06, 2005

Jill Whalen's "SEO Ramblings"
HighRankings.com

Dave's Comments: I subscribe to Jill's High Rankings Advisor Newsletter, and it's always a treat to receive the next edition. This past week Jill reiterated some SEO common sense that I think can help ALL of my readers, especially those who are considering hiring an SEO "expert" for the first time to optimize their Web sites. Enjoy!

"Recently, I've read a lot of articles and forum posts from people discussing what they believe to be the most important factors in achieving high rankings. Some I agree with, but others make me feel like I'm in a completely different line of work! Unfortunately, with so much misinformation and half-truths out there, stuff gets repeated by many who have never really bothered to check the accuracy of their statements. It's fine to speculate about SEO techniques that may or may not work, but people need to remember to make it clear that what they're saying is often just a guess or a hunch.

When it comes to SEO, those who study it often mix up cause and effect. They notice a difference in ranking after they made a specific change on their site and assume it meant that their change is what caused the ranking to move. It may have, but it may not have. The single most important thing to understand is that your rankings will constantly move, regardless of anything you do. That's just a fact of life in the SEO game. It's very difficult to be 100% positive in regards to the cause and effect of search engine results.

The other thing that I see happening a lot is that people may read good articles that discuss great techniques which actually will make sites better for both search engines and users, but they misinterpret them. Many people in this world want or need an exact blueprint for how to do stuff. They need rules and regulations and a specific formula they can follow. Well, guess what? When it comes to SEO, there is no such thing! If you can't work without a formula, you need to find a new line of work, and you need to do it now.

For instance, you've probably heard me say a million times "Make sure to have great keyword-rich content."

Now, I of course know exactly what I mean by that, and so do many others. But it is open-ended enough to confuse some people. Does keyword-rich content mean you should find every available spot on your page to stuff your keywords? Of course not! In fact, if you are even using the word "stuff" in the same sentence as "keywords," it's most likely not something you want to do. Writing keyword-rich content has nothing to do with stuffing. (We save all our stuffing for Thanksgiving, thank you very much!) To me, it's common sense that it's a bad idea to stick keyword phrases everywhere and anywhere. But unless I specifically point out the exact places on a page where you might want to put them (and might not), some people will never quite get it.

Unfortunately, even when I do spell it out, like in my Nitty-gritty Guide there will always be people who will take my suggestions further than they should. They have not learned the most important rule in professional search engine optimization, i.e., always put your site users before the search engines in anything that you do for your website.

The sad (and kinda scary) thing is that even professional SEO companies don't always get this. I've had 2 or 3 emails just this week from people who hired various SEO companies to do work for them, only to have the company make recommendations that actually made the pages of their website *worse* than they were before they hired the company. Not necessarily worse for the search engines, but most definitely worse for the site visitors. In this day and age, it's hard for me to fathom that an SEO company would still be telling their clients, "You have to do this for the search engines, even though we realize it makes your site look dumb."

No, you absolutely do not!

There is no SEO technique that you should have to do on your site that will make your site icky for your visitors. Don't believe it for a second. There may certainly be some trade-offs that your SEO may suggest to you, but you should be able to pick and choose the ones that will work for your site and still get the results you are hoping for.

Another thing people seem to misunderstand is link-building. Many people think that they *must* perform a reciprocal-linking campaign in order to achieve high rankings. The error in this thinking has to do with the reciprocity aspect. They have heard the word "reciprocal" so many times that they think it's the secret to success. Yet the only reason people ever started doing reciprocal-linking campaigns was because it just happened to be one of the easiest ways to obtain a link! That doesn't mean you have to give a link to get a link. You don't. There are tons of ways to get links other than trading for them. Many sites don't lend themselves to having a links page, and that is okay! Don't let an SEO company force you into creating one if it's just not appropriate for your company.

This is not to say that you don't need links -- you very much do need links because they bring visitors to your site, and they tell the search engines that you have a site that has some decent information on it. If trading links is not for you, that's okay. You just need to start thinking creatively. SEO companies that will do only a reciprocal-linking campaign and no other type are either lazy or unimaginative, or both. (Or you may simply not be paying them enough!)

Always remember that every site has its own unique needs, and its own target market. I cannot stress enough that whatever you do for your website to make it better for the search engines should first and foremost also make it better for your users. If you're doing something for the search engines that you really don't like, or that you think looks stupid, then by all means avoid doing it. Use common sense and creativity, and you will eventually have a site you can be proud of, which also gets found by people looking for what you offer!"

========
Jill Whalen of High Rankings is an internationally recognized search engine optimization consultant and host of the free weekly High Rankings Advisor search engine marketing newsletter.

She specializes in search engine optimization, SEO consultations and seminars. Jill's handbook, "The Nitty-gritty of Writing for the Search Engines" teaches business owners how and where to place relevant keyword phrases on their Web sites so that they make sense to users and gain high rankings in the major search engines.

Technorati Tags: , ,


Friday, August 05, 2005

Interesting Customer Acquisition Cost Info

Presented by Michael Levine, Director of Strategic Alliances, Yahoo Search Marketing, at "List Vision 2005":

"At $8.50 a pop, the cost of acquiring one new customer by search engine marketing is far the lowest; compared to $20 with Yellow Pages advertising, $50 using display advertising, $60 via e-mail and $70 with direct."

Technorati Tags: , ,